For litigation lawyers

Opposing counsel will check every case you cite. Check them first.

I am a litigation lawyer. Why would I want Juris?

Your name goes on the factum. The research, the drafting and the checking can come from anywhere, but the responsibility does not move. Juris is built around that: it does the heavy lifting on the file, and the last click stays yours.

The moments, and where Juris fits

The draft is due tomorrow, and it cites cases you have not opened yet.

Citations in the answer are checked against a case-law database and linked for you to confirm. If it cannot be verified, it says so.

The factum needs a Table of Authorities tonight.

Juris builds a Table of Authorities that tells you which authorities are confirmed and which are not.

Disclosure has landed, and you need to know where your case is weak before the other side tells you.

Sage has six ways to work, among them analysis of the case, an investigative read of your own record, and an opposing view that argues the other side.

An associate’s draft is about to go out under your name.

A partner reviews and approves before a draft is filed to the matter. Export a Juris draft to PDF or Word before a lawyer has approved it and every page is stamped UNVERIFIED.

Part of the file is privileged.

Flag a document as privileged and it is excluded from all AI processing, enforced in the database query. You set the flag; Juris enforces it.

The motion date is set, and the deadlines around it matter.

Compute a deadline from a trigger date, with the governing authority attached, and confirm it before it is tracked. For litigation, that is a rule you enter yourself.

What Juris does not do

A draft stays a draft until you say otherwise. The last click is yours.

An illustration of how a practice might use Juris, not a client story. General information, not legal advice.